Top Defense Democrats Demand Answers From Pentagon On President Trump's Order...

U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL ^ | 10/30/2019 | U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL

[mdittmar]

Top Defense Democrats Demand Answers From Pentagon On President Trump's Order To Withhold Ukraine Military Aid

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), Vice Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, and U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper demanding answers regarding the Trump Administration’s improper withholding of military aid to Ukraine and the Defense Department’s role in the process.

The Senators are seeking information from Secretary Esper regarding President Trump’s decision to manipulate national security assistance for his own political gain by halting the delivery of Congressionally-mandated security assistance funds to Ukraine; what role Pentagon officials played in the hold up; and who directed them to do so. 

“The withholding of those funds raises serious concerns about the Department’s management of security assistance and the Administration’s compliance with its statutory obligations, potentially including the Impoundment Control Act of 1974,” Durbin and Reed wrote.  “We are deeply concerned that the Administration decided to delay execution of this critical military aid to Ukraine and failed to inform the committees of this decision or provide a reason for the delay.”

Given the Trump Administration’s shifting explanations for the freeze, Durbin and Reed are seeking answers from Secretary Esper about: the timeline of events; who directed the freeze and how it was communicated throughout the chain of command; whether anyone within the Department of Defense raised concerns about the freeze and how those concerns were handled; and why the Trump Administration failed to inform Congressional oversight committees of the delay in the execution of the Ukraine security assistance in a timely manner.

Full text of the letter is available below:

 

October 29, 2019

Dear Secretary Esper: 

United States support to Ukraine has been vital to enabling Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity against Russian aggression.  The Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) has been essential for building the capacity of the Ukrainian security forces to counter Russia and Russian-backed separatists and encourage the Ukrainian Government to institute necessary defense reforms.  The withholding of those funds raises serious concerns about the Department’s management of security assistance and the Administration’s compliance with its statutory obligations, potentially including the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

For fiscal year 2019, Congress authorized and appropriated $250 million for the USAI.  On February 28th and May 23rd, 2019, the Department of Defense (DOD) notified the relevant congressional oversight committees of its plans for delivering this military assistance to Ukraine in two tranches, each estimated at $125 million.  DOD officials briefed committee staff on the details of each of those tranches within weeks and the committees approved release of those funds promptly following each briefing. 

Given the expeditious process between the Department and the congressional committees in approving the tranches of USAI funding, we are deeply concerned that the Administration decided to delay execution of this critical military aid to Ukraine and failed to inform the committees of this decision or provide a reason for the delay.  It has been reported that around July 18th the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), at the direction of the President, directed the Departments of Defense and State to withhold security assistance funds for Ukraine.  Yet, it was not until mid-August that in response to congressional inquiries, Defense and State officials told congressional staff that OMB had directed the funds be held up pending an “interagency review,” without providing any explanation of the purpose of that review.  These funds were not released until mid-September, resulting in the expiration of $34 million in DOD assistance to Ukraine – funds that would have been returned to the Treasury unspent had not Congress intervened to preserve the funding in the current continuing resolution. 

In light of these events, we request that you provide us the following information in writing, no later than November 11th, 2019: 

1. Provide a timeline of the Department of Defense’s execution of the February 28 and May 23 tranches of USAI, starting on the date of submittal of the notifications to Congress and including:
   1. The date the Department received approval from all the relevant committees of jurisdiction;
   2. The date by which the Department had completed its efforts to execute the funding for each of the tranches;
   3. The date and process by which the Department was directed to hold the execution of the USAI funds;
   4. The date or dates of any meetings as part of the interagency review of the USAI funds;
   5. The date and process by which the Department was informed of the release of the USAI funds for execution;
   6. The date by which the Department was able to complete execution of the USAI funds in both tranches.
2. Who directed the Department to hold up execution of the USAI funds?  Was this direction provided directly to the Comptroller’s office from the Office of Management and Budget?  How did the Comptroller inform other offices within the Department of the hold on USAI funds?  What was the understanding of Department officials as to why the USAI funds were being held up?
3. Did the Department review military assistance to Ukraine in the summer of 2019, as indicated by press reports?  What issues were examined, and what were the Department’s recommendations?
4. Did any Department officials raise concerns with the OMB, the White House, or other Administration officials about the decision to hold up execution of the USAI funds?  If so, what was the nature of those concerns, to whom were they conveyed, and what answers did the Department receive in response to these concerns? 
5. Did Department officials ever raise concerns over the delay in execution of the USAI funds with the DOD Office of the General Counsel (DOD/GC)?  If so, what was the nature of those concerns and what was the advice of the DOD/GC in this regard?
6. Why did it take so long for the Department to inform congressional oversight committees of the delay in the execution of the Ukraine security assistance?  Was the Department directed not to immediately inform Congress of the delay?
7. At the time of the hold up, had the Department negotiated contracts with suppliers for the equipment to be provided under the two tranches of USAI funds?  When did the Department inform suppliers of the delay in the contracts for this equipment?   
8. Who informed the Department that the hold on the execution of USAI funds had been released?  What was the understanding of Department officials as to why the USAI funds were released at that time? 
9. Please provide any written documents relating to the hold, any policy reviews, and subsequent release of the USAI funds.  

Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. 

Sincerely,

-30-

[mdittmar]

It took a while,but I knew Dick would weigh in;)

[SoFloFreeper]

Dick Turban can take a hike.

[lurk]

All the time ignoring Joe Biden dangling $1B on the Ukrainians.

[BenLurkin]

Since the Ukrainians are corrupting Biden and other important people in the US, then holding up money makes a lot of sense

[DOC44]

go fish

[JoSixChip]

So the senate finally weighs in with an actual demand? It appears the dems are willing to fight against Trump, I wish the repubs had someone willing to fight for him.

[faithhopecharity]

What idiots. Improper withholding of aid to Ukraine? Where do they get off, anyway. And just who ( other then themselves) do they represent?

[mdittmar]

They just knocked Biden out of the 2020 Election;)

[ctdonath2]

But somehow, that Biden did worse for personal gain is OK by them.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

Yeah - what are they stressing about there. Concerned they were gonna miss out on their cut of the graft?

 

 

[M Kehoe]

Dickey Turban can ESAD.

5.56mm

[eyeamok]

Dear Senator Durbin,

If you would have actually read the US Constitution that you swore an oath to protect, defend and preserve, you would know that Congress only Appropriates Money and has no authority to Spend Anything, that is left to the Executive branch.

[Shady]

These turncoats are to be cast aside. We must find challengers who will support Liberty, and our President.

[FlipWilson]

Wow, that is some letter. You know, like the one they wrote to Ukraine threatening to withhold aid unless Ukraine aided in the Russian Hoax investigation.

[odawg]

What with the corrupt machinations of little adam shiff and his committee issuing subpoenas and since the Executive branch is a co-equal branch of government, why can’t the Trump administration issue some subpoenas?

I just heard Levin say that Congress issuing subpoenas is a mere thirty year tradition and is not Constitutionally authorized.

So, if a committee of Congress, a small part of the Legislative branch, can compel witnesses, then the White House can also. It is also not Constitutionally authorized, but since when does that enter the debate lately?

The White House should also mandate all kinds of financial disclosures.

[SaveFerris]

The Democrat Coup continues.

While they cover for Joe Biden’s crimes.

Joe Biden’s ADMITTED crimes.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Horowitz and Durham have the Rats scurrying.

[Mariner]

It is WELL within the purview of POTUS to withhold military aid for just about any reason.

Including administrative corruption by the recipient.

[Future Snake Eater]

This BS is SO tiresome. Just b/c Congress authorizes money for an expenditure doesn't mean it HAS to be spent, just that it has to be spent on that thing/category (think "colors of money"). That's it. Of course, the Democrats know this, but they and the media will grasp at any straw they can to drag it out in the headlines.

[StAnDeliver]

Yawn. C/level mandarin onanism.