To: chris37
I wonder why they havent gone underground there.
Short answer: It’s really expensive. It can be worth it in a densely populated area where you have a few dozen feet of underground wire per household. But when you are burying tens or hundreds of miles of cable for a relatively small number of customers the cost is prohibitive.
50 posted on
10/30/2019 8:01:38 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: cuban leaf
So it would seem like the only answer is to accept the risk, and then engage in risk mitigation as well as you possibly can.
I would say that in the case of California, the black outs are not the answer. Doesn’t seem to be helping.
51 posted on
10/30/2019 8:04:36 AM PDT by
chris37
(Where's Hunter?)
To: cuban leaf
53 posted on
10/30/2019 8:06:44 AM PDT by
chris37
(Where's Hunter?)
To: cuban leaf
So burning everything every year is cheaper?
Sounds crazy. You bury them once for very long time.
No expenses, just maintenance.
IMO, much cheaper solution.
To: cuban leaf
A caller to Rush Monday stated that his community has buried utilities, but power was cut off to that, and nearby communities, anyway. It may be decades before there’s relief.
97 posted on
10/30/2019 10:41:20 PM PDT by
Does so
(.Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson