Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: Sondland told the House that Trump's Ukraine pressure was a quid pro quo
thehill.com ^ | October 26, 2019 | Rachel Frazin

Posted on 10/26/2019 11:53:11 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Berlin_Freeper

There’s always strings attached to government money - evidenced by constraints put on churches for being tax-exempt...


41 posted on 10/27/2019 5:17:04 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

A thousand antiTrumpers saying so doesn’t make it true.


42 posted on 10/27/2019 5:26:13 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

There is no testimony.

This man said nothing.


43 posted on 10/27/2019 5:29:08 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Every deal between two nations involves a quid pro quo even if often the quo is never delivered and the quid winds up in out of borders banks.


44 posted on 10/27/2019 5:46:39 AM PDT by arthurus (|-|>/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
The Hill is barely Left of center.

They may be despicable but there are plenty of news outlets and publications that are to the extreme Left of The Hill and have worse reputations.


45 posted on 10/27/2019 5:49:26 AM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
I recall just this last week, that Taylor's leaked testimony was refuted by Sondland's lawyer.

He said Sondland's recollection of what his conversations with Taylor entailed, were not what Taylor testified to in the uber-Secret Star Chamber Impeachment tribunal run by SchifftyEyes.

So which is it?

46 posted on 10/27/2019 5:57:51 AM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

They called anti Trump biased participants.... if they want to keep this up on quid pro quo ... go after obama ... using the IRS to pressure conservatives .. going to a bakery to get a cake baked by the place they know do not want to help the 2 men or 2 women, marry. obama controlled everything by applying whatever pressure he had to... with powerful pressure to be had at his disposal... he was up to no good from day one.


47 posted on 10/27/2019 6:10:11 AM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

If ‘quid pro quo’ is illegal then we’re all in trouble. I ‘quid pro quo’ every day. ‘Quid pro quo’ is how commerce works. Freeloaders, bums and thieves are the only ones that don’t ‘quid pro quo.’


48 posted on 10/27/2019 6:14:21 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Yes, and how do they know this anyway? Who is leaking to them?


49 posted on 10/27/2019 7:51:56 AM PDT by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

Good for him. Why be under someone else’s thumb?


50 posted on 10/28/2019 10:05:23 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (What profits a man if he gains the world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson