Posted on 10/25/2019 10:54:14 AM PDT by Cboldt
“As hillary said... If I lose, we all hang.”
I remember that from an email. This morning I did a Google search, looking for that specific email and all that kept coming up was the Snopes site saying that it was FALSE.
I remember reading the email and want to find the actual reference. If you have it and share, Thank You.
and all that kept coming up was the Snopes site saying that it was FALSE.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, if snopes says so then it must be so. /s
“Many of Trump’s appointments that turned out badly were on advice from people he thought he could trust that were actually working against him.”
I agree. Christopher Wray is Exhibit A.
Which is why we should expect Schitt to drop another one of his self-penned "bombshells" before 6 PM today
The whole process of FBI interviews without recordings of any type, and then filling out 302’s days later from “notes” needs to be scrapped, pulverized with a big hammer and the earth salted behind it.
Bkmk
Yes. If a local police department operated that way, the FBI and DOJ would hit them with a patterns and practices lawsuit and take them over.
No bodycams, no officers names released when they shoot anyone until months later, no recorders in interviews... nothing. They talk to you and WRITE down THEIR version of what you said. Totally crooked Hoover era rule
Maybe your reason about discrediting Flynn is right but it no doubt was part of the plan to take out Trump, get all those around him in the quest to get to that almighty impeachment. It’s just taken longer than they planned once the Mueller report didn’t convict Trump.
Loki’s twin
His will be looked back on as a transformative administration.
So why is the FBI still an agency? It should be have been disbanded, and their Gestapo agents thrown into GITMO.
Gen. Flynn needs a full pardon for the wrongful prosecution and persecution, and he should receive complete restitution.
“Which is why we should expect Schitt to drop another one of his self-penned “bombshells” before 6 PM today”
/////
Maybe .... but Schifty is too busy reading parodies and nursery rhymes.
https://www.trendsmap.com/twitter/tweet/1183203702540251136
Proverbs 6:16-19
These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an
abomination unto him:
17: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed
innocent blood,
18: An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be
swift in running to mischief,
19: A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth
discord among brethren.
Don’t trust law enforcement at any level.
Ever.
Speaking of which, Barr assisted Horouchi's defense pro-bono.
Not a stellar recommendation.
Interview/and commentary. Her melt down was not captured on film but was relayed by a second party who witnessed it.
No kidding. I did not know that.
Just a brief victory lap - on December 30, 2018 I posted the same thing Sydney Powell is now saying. The post is copied below.
The Terrible Stink: FBI Treatment of General Flynn
12/30/2018, 3:14:34 PM · 25 of 30
brookwood to Albion Wilde
It is important to read the actual 1/24/2017 302 which was finally made public on Dec 17. From this account - written apparently by Bill Priestap not Peter Stroczk, it does not appear the Flynn lied to the agents, because he qualified his statements by saying “I don’t remember” and “it is possible”.
“The interviewing agents asked FLYNN if he recalled any conversation with KISLYAK in which the expulsions were discussed, where FLYNN might have encouraged KISLYAK not to escalate the situation, to keep the Russian response reciprocal... FLYNN responded “Not really. I don’t remember””
“The interviewing agents asked FLYNN if he recalled any conversation with KISLYAK in which KISLYAK told him the Government of Russia had taken into account the incoming administration’s position about the expulsions... FLYNN stated it was possible that he talked to KISLYAK on the issue but if he did, he did not remember doing so”.
So FLYNN did not lie to the agents, he simply did not remember the details of the conversation, and in fact stated it was “possible” that he discussed the expulsions with KISLYAK. Also there were multiple conversations with KISLYAK, so it is possible that he did not remember in which conversation these issues came up. Perjury requires a criminal intent among other things, and a knowledge that what you are saying is false. This is obviously not perjury. What was he trying to hide? That we didn’t want Russian to nuke Washington over the expulsions? Why would anyone lie about that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.