Posted on 10/23/2019 4:29:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
A recently revealed court ruling received very little media attention. Most Americans are not aware that U.S. District Judge James Boasberg (an Obama nominee) issued a scathing indictment of our federal spy program. This ruling exposed improper searches of “tens of thousands” of illegal searches of raw intelligence databases, including 70,000 emails and telephone numbers, and other digital identifiers that were illegally searched. The Judge ruled that these searches were not consistent with the Fourth Amendment.
As serious as this ruling is, the media is preoccupied working on their partisan coup attempt of the Trump administration, masked as impeachment. While these liberal media hacks focus on the junk that has little impact on the American people, assaults on our liberty are a significant issue they are purposely marginalizing. Why? Keep reading.
In the months following the attacks of 9-11 the government took advantage of a nation still in shock. The government told Congress that if they only had the tools, they could prevent another attack but to do so we had to give away some essential liberties. Everybody in the media and Congress fell for it without much discussion because nobody wanted to be accused of aiding terrorists to attack again. We have to do something was the rallying cry. U.S. spy agencies knew they had an emotionally vulnerable public that could be easily persuaded to give away these essential liberties, thereby allowing the government broad surveillance authority to violate the Fourth Amendment in the name of national security. The government promised that they wouldn’t abuse it even though, by its very nature, intelligence work is highly intrusive. We were also promised strict oversight. They were required to self-report when abuses were discovered. Instead, this only became public after the FBI went to an appeals court to block the judgment against them and lost. Since its inception, I opposed the Patriot Act and its ugly stepsister the USA Freedom Act. This marks, perhaps, the only time I have ever sided with the American Civil Liberties Union on a law enforcement issue.
Giving the government unbridled authority to search into our digital lives without being suspected of wrongdoing and without probable cause is not consistent with a constitutional democracy and self-rule. It’s not whether the government can be trusted; instead, they should never be trusted. I believe our nation’s Founders also understood this. This is why we have a constitution, a pact between government and citizens limiting vast intrusions into our daily lives. I realize that government overreach has significantly expanded today, but a restrained federal bureaucracy is still the foundation of this republic.
The problem with the post 9-11 spying authority is that it allows the government to operate under a veil of secrecy. For example, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) gives the government the authority to work around the Fourth Amendment. But as we have seen with government agents requesting a search warrant or searching without one, the lack of an adversarial stage like in criminal courts, results in the loss of liberties. A core American principle is that a government working for the people must be transparent to the people. The government’s claim that more transparency would hamper an investigation is nothing more than hyperbole. Nobody contests that platitude and government agents know it. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court- FISC judges, do not have the experience in spy operations to be able to ask pointed questions to test the validity of an agent’s claims. As a result, most applications for a search warrant in a FISA court are nearly unanimously approved. The congressional staff that does most of the oversight work lack the same experience about how these operations work, so they sit there and nod in agreement with whatever crap an experienced spy agency bureaucrat feeds them. Recall that the FBI went to a FISC to request a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign and were granted one based on a fake dossier. Even if an oversight committee asks relevant questions, the answer more times than not is that answering would jeopardize national security. That is coded language for, “we don’t want you to know because the answer would embarrass us.” Thus the FISC has become a rubber stamp on government testimony in a search warrant request or in operations called “sneak and peek” where they search digital data without a warrant. Government agents then hide what they do by classifying it as top secret. This is a problem. As we are seeing, when no one is watching, abuse runs rampant.
An important question in these government surveillance abuses is who did it and what consequences will there be for this severe breach of people’s privacy. We never hear who specifically violated the Constitution or how they will be disciplined. Again it’s because the government operates in the dark. The agent responsible should be publicly named. This alone will make them think twice about skirting the Constitution because of public shame and humiliation. When a court finds that a local law enforcement officer violated someone’s Fourth Amendment rights, the evidence is thrown out, and that particular officer’s identity can be learned through public information disclosure. They can face criminal indictment under a 1983 claim for instance for violating a person’s rights under the color of law or civil court sanctions. That serves as a deterrent and accountability. With federal agents engaged in surveillance operations that are hidden from public view, it becomes impossible to hold people accountable.
Apparently court decisions like this aren’t sexy enough for headline coverage in major newspapers or cable news. Congress currently is too preoccupied with the kabuki theater of impeachment. Will Adam Schiff call for hearings, demanding our civil liberties be protected from abuse? No. My suggestion is that they stop the political game-playing and work on something of value to the American people like their oversight responsibility of our spy agencies to prevent these abuses. I know. Wishful thinking.
The media is nothing more than a propaganda arm of the deep state.
Both are the willing minions of our Corrupt American Oligarchs.
It's more than that. It's the name of a borough in Pennsylvania (the seat of Delaware County) and a theatre therein.
ff
Trumps election revealed to us - “the media” (mainly dying TV and print news) are oligopolist, corporate, ideologically controlled elitist/government mouthpieces.
I am convinced CNN is run by the CIA, no different from PRAVDA or People’s Daily are in other countries.
“Since its inception, I opposed the Patriot Act and its ugly stepsister the USA Freedom Act.”
The names alone, should raise red flags.
Ever since the amendments were added, lawmakers have been trying their best to invalidate them all the while claiming that they are not.
CONTACT: The Associated Press headquarters
212.621.1500 or email info@ap.org for general inquiries.
Contact CBS New York
https://newyork.cbslocal.com › contact-us
SWITCHBOARD: 212-975-4321.
NEWSLINE: 800-CH-2-NEWS (800-242-6397) FAX: 212-975-9387.
(Note: Story ideas should be faxed to the attention of “Assignment Desk.”)
ASSIGNMENT DESK: 212-975-5867, desk@cbs2ny.com.
STATION SERVICES: stationservices@cbs2ny.com.
CBS2’s DIGITAL EDITORIAL STAFF: 212-975-7675
CBS Press Express
https://www.cbspressexpress.com
CBS NEWS Christa Robinson. Senior Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888. robinsonc@cbsnews.com.
Lance Frank. Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888
ContactCBS Interactive
https://www.cbsinteractive.com › contact
Contact BS Audience Network, CBS All Access, CBS News. cbssales@cbsinteractive
CBSI-Programmatic@cbsinteractive.com ...
FAIR’s Media Contact List
https://fair.org › take-action-now › media-contact-list
FAIR’s Media Contact List 1-212-456-7777 / 1-212-456-7700.
Email forms for ABC news programs ...
Email forms for all CBS news programs @CBSNews.
https://newyork.cbslocal.com › contact-us
Contact Us. SWITCHBOARD: 212-975-4321. NEWSLINE: 800-CH-2-NEWS (800-242-6397) FAX: 212-975-9387. (Note: Story ideas should be faxed to the attention of “Assignment Desk.” ASSIGNMENT DESK: 212-975-5867, desk@cbs2ny.com. STATION SERVICES: stationservices@cbs2ny.com. CBS2’s DIGITAL EDITORIAL STAFF: 212-975-7675, by email ...
CBS Headquarters Information – Headquarters Info
www.headquartersinfo.com › Television
CBS is a telecommunications business responsible for CBS News and the CBS ... Email: You can contact CBS headquarters by email via the investor relations ...
Contacts - CBS Press Express
https://www.cbspressexpress.com › cbs-news › contacts
Christa Robinson. Senior Vice President, Communications. 212-975-2888. robinsonc@cbsnews.com. Lance Frank. Vice President, Communications. 212-975- ...
CBS News: Contact Information, Journalists, and Overview ...
https://muckrack.com › media-outlet › cbsnews
Use Muck Rack to learn more about CBS News and connect with journalists at CBS News.
Contact CBS Interactive
https://www.cbsinteractive.com › contact
Contact CBS.com, CBS Audience Network, CBS All Access, CBS News. cbssales@cbsinteractive. ... Advertising. CBSI-Programmatic@cbsinteractive.com ...
ABC-NEWS
ABC News, 47 West 66th Street,
New York, NY 10023.(212) 456-2400
You can reach ABC-NEWS via email at news.tips@abc.com or by phone at (212) 456-2400
NOTE the information you provide might be used in our broadcasts or other stories.
Contact ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com › Site › page › contact-abcnewscom-3068843
Please use the links below to direct your e-mail to the various ABC News broadcasts and to ABCNews.com on the Web.
NBS NEWS STAFF
Catherine Kim / Executive.Editor@nbcuni.com
Managing Editor David Firestone / Managing.Editor@nbcuni.com
Assistant Managing Editor for News Tim Perone / Tim.Perone@nbcuni.com
Television contacts:
NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt: nightly@nbcuni.com
Meet the Press: contact.mtp@nbcuni.com
Today: TodayStories@nbcuni.com
Digital Editors:
Senior Tech Editor, Jason Abbruzzese / Jason.Abbruzzese@nbcuni.com
Senior THINK Editor, Meredith Bennett-Smith / think@nbcuni.com
Senior Politics Editor, Gregg Birnbaum / Gregg.Birnbaum@nbcuni.com
Senior Editor, News Projects, Anna Brand / Anna.Brand@nbcuni.com
Senior News Editor, London, Brinley Bruton / Brinley.Bruton@nbcuni.com
THINK Editor, Megan Carpentier / think@nbcuni.com
Copy Editor, Dipti Coorg / Dipti.Coorg@nbcuni.com
News Editor, Los Angeles, Amanda Covarrubius / Amanda.Covarrubius@nbcuni.com
Breaking News Editor, Maia Davis / Maia.Davis@nbcuni.com
Bureau Manager, Los Angeles, Richie Duchon / Richie.Duchon@nbcuni.com
Catherine Kim / Executive.Editor@nbcuni.com
Managing Editor
David Firestone / Managing.Editor@nbcuni.com
Assistant Managing Editor for News
Tim Perone / Tim.Perone@nbcuni.com
Television contacts:
NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt: nightly@nbcuni.com
Meet the Press: contact.mtp@nbcuni.com
Today: TodayStories@nbcuni.com
Dateline NBC: dateline.contactus@nbcuni.com
MSNBC: MSNBCTVinfo@nbcuni.com
The Rachel Maddow Show: rachel@nbcuni.com
NBC News Media Relations: nbcnewsmediarelations@nbcuni.com
TALKING POINTS
Out-Of-Control Pelosi/Schiff Ban Republicans Frm Viewing Transcripts of ‘Secret’Impeachment Hearings
Rightwingtribune.com ^ | Dean James October 22, 2019
FR Posted on 10/22/2019, 5:42:38 PM by Red Badger
Republicans have allegedly been barred from even viewing transcripts taken during impeachment hearings. This includes the transcripts of Executive Branch employees who, it has been reported, have provided largely exculpatory testimony.
Testimony, that because of Pelosi’s rules, we’ll never see. Neither will House Republicans or President Trump’s attorneys. Schiff/Pelosi-led Democrats will craft the narrative and the limited ‘factual’ evidence that becomes public in a carefully managed scheme to shape public opinion.
Does this sound familiar? It should: “The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.” This is the latest attempt to silence the defense of President Trump while Democrats rely on the echo chamber of their media allies to present cherry-picked passages to move public opinion to support their illicit scam.
Here’s one example of how the narrative is being crafted and supported by the equally corrupt mainstream media:
Swamp guardian Chris Wallace presented this limited text message exchange as evidence of a quid pro quo:
Here’s what wasn’t shown and that Pelosi ignored in cherry-picked fact sheet she released yesterday:
Pelosi’s rules prevent Republicans from asking questions that may have inconvenient answers during the hearings lest the media have something positive to report in the president’s defense. Republicans are not permitted to call defense witnesses of their own.
Democrats are so paranoid about keeping a lid on the proceedings that at least some of the hearings are said to have been conducted in a SCIF that has been, up until now, reserved for holding top secret discussions or for reviewing highly-classified evidence. This ain’t that. Americans who are watching these latter-day Democrats should ask themselves if they can do this to a president, what chance they would have against these authoritarians?
The ultimate stupidity is that the news media has the most to lose.
What a bunch crap this law needs to go. FISA court judges are corrupt.
Obama used this to spy on everyone - yes everyone they could
Agreed on CNN being controlled by the government as are fakebook, google, Twitter and the rest.
The media is like the democrats have proved they can never be trusted.
In the Bible Code Book, it has a passage that is interpreted,
“Bush hurts Constitution.”
In the Bible Code Book, it has a passage that is interpreted,
“Bush hurts Constitution.”
Every time there’s an attack on our country, and we respond with more gov, more police-state legislation to “protect America”, it’s one more step to losing the war on terror/illegal immigration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.