MSNBC Panel Very Worried Over Investigation Into Origin of Russia Probe

Newsbusters ^ | 10/22/2019 | Alex Christy

[Kevin in California]

It is a common refrain on MSNBC in the age of Trump that nobody is above law and to raise questions about investigations into high ranking officials is damaging to our institutions, unless of course that investigations is looking into alleged misconduct during the Obama years, then it is the investigation that is the threat to institutions. Such, was the argument that Andrea Mitchell made on her Monday show alongside former Obama officials Wendy Sherman and Ned Price in a segment that also torched plenty of strawmen in an attempt to described John Durham's investigation into the origins of the Russia probe.

Mitchell led off the segment by laying out the latest developments in Durham's investigation, "Attorney General William Barr's investigation into the origins of the Mueller probe has apparently gone a lot further than previously known, digging into CIA and FBI and decision making by President Obama with lead prosecutor John Durham taking on more staff in a push to speak to current and former intelligence officials in the U.S. and overseas."

[gogeo]

"So? We made some bad decisions. Who hasn't?"

To quote my ex-wife, "Mistakes were made."

[laplata]

They’ll definitely try. After Trump is gone, look out. They’ll be brutal.

[SpaceBar]

Trump sticking our collective conservative dicks in a hornet nest and exiting stage left when he leaves office would set up a very bad situation to say the least. Hillary and Zero need to be arrested for various crimes and put away or put down. Otherwise they and their minions will be back with a vengeance. Lying and corruption evidently does pay. People who pay attention to history know what’s at stake.

[babyfreep]

After Trump is gone, look out. They’ll be brutal.

They will. If nothing else, over the years...the left has proven itself a very patient monster. I really don't want to see them more brutal than they are now.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

These MSNBC putzes are worried that they own corrupted, inaccurate, disinformational and leftist reporting will be totally exposed by the DOJ investigations and those of Judicial Watch, John Sullivan/Sara Carter, Gregg Jarrett, Peter Sweitzer, Andrew McCarthy, Dan Bongino, etc.

[gasport]

“ Because they are liars, deeply and profoundly dishonest people.”

Who deserve to be indicted - All of them.

[Liz]

AG Barr revealed DOJ investigations into media leaks .....determining how MSM had scoops
on the Trump-Russia investigation long before Congress was aware of the subject matter.

The linchpin is the Clintons.

ITEM <><> Journalists Dined at Top Clinton Staffers Homes Days Before Hillary’s announcement of her candidacy
Wikileaks via Breitbart ^ | October 17 2016 | Ezra Dulis / FR Posted by grey_whiskers

Several top journalists and TV news anchors RSVPed “yes” to attend a private, off-the-record gathering at the New York home of Joel Benenson, the chief campaign strategist for Hillary Clinton, two days before she announced her candidacy in 2015, according to emails Wikileaks published from John Podesta’s accounts.

ITEM <><> The guest list for an earlier event at the home of her campaign manager, John Podesta, was limited to
reporters who were expected to cover Clinton on the campaign trail. —snip—

ITEM <><> Wikileaks revealed earlier that late night talk host Stephen Colbert, and his team at Comedy Central, were making TV episodes at the request or order of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) back in April of 2013. So, viewers thought they were vote-smart because they’re informed by a comedian, yet same said comedian was doing Hillary’s bidding the whole time.

ITEM <><> Hillary frequently used the Democrats' "wrap-up smear."......leaking false info about her opponent to the media. When the obedient press published the smear, Hillary would wave it around indicating she was the superior candidate.

===================================

The Clinton Foundation listed "notable past members" they were cozy with.
This page was carried in the Clinton Foundation archives........until recently.

Page has since been deleted from Clinton Foundation archives.

[Liz]

Wikileaks Reveals All the Journalists Who Schmoozed With Clinton Campaign

According to a list first published in The Intercept, ( there to learn what they should think about Clinton’s 2016 announcement ),
expectations for Hillary's launch period and the framing of her message was an all-star cast of mainstream media denizens.

There were Cecilia Vega, David Muir, Diane Sawyer, Jon Karl and George Stephanopoulos of ABC News; John Heilemann and Mark Halperin of Bloomberg; Norah O’Donnell and Vicki Gordon of CBS News; Brianna Keilar, David Chalian, Gloria Borger, Jeff Zeleny, John Berman, Kate Bouldan, Mark Preston and Sam Feist of CNN; Savannah Guthrie of NBC; and Alex Wagner, Beth Fouhy, Phil Grifin and Rachel Racusen of MSNBC. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow was listed as TBD.

There were five staffers from the New York Times – Amy Chozik, Gail Collins, Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman and Pat Healey, as well as Alyssa Mastramonoco of Vice, Jon Allen of Vox, Mike Allen of Axios, and Glenn Thrush of Politico, who was later found to have submitted stories to the Clinton campaign for approval.

A similar group attended a dinner the night before at John Podesta’s house. Podesta, then Clinton’s campaign manager, writes a column for The Washington Post.

Attendees at the Podesta dinner included Liz Kreutz of ABC, Julie Pace, Ken Thomas and Lisa Lerer of the Associated Press; Jennifer Epstein of Bloomberg, April Ryan of the American Urban Radio Network, Rudy Cramer of Buzzfeed, Mike Memoli and Evan Handler of the Los Angeles Times, Alex Seitz-Wald of MSNBC, Mark Murray of NBC, Anita Kumar of McClatchey, Amy Chozik and Maggie Haberman of the New York Times, Tamara Keith ofNPR and Annie Karni and Gabe Debenedetti of Politico.

No Fox reporters attended either of these meetings.

[The Westerner]

But the info is still in Wikileaks which is where I read about the attendance of those propagandists. Reading Clinton and Podesta emails on Wikileaks provided an education on swamp operations.

[laplata]

I certainly understand and agree.

I have said for a very long time that Hillary, for instance, would make Hitler and Stalin blush with envy if she ever could do so.