Posted on 10/22/2019 3:27:43 AM PDT by LibWhacker
The U.S. Army is pushing ahead with plans to field a cannon with an astounding 1,000-mile+ range. The cannon, along with hypersonic weapons, will allow the service to attack long range, strategic-level targets far beyond the reach of existing Army systems.
According to Defense News, the Army’s program manager for long range fires, Col. John Rafferty, the service expects the gun to have a range of 1,000 nautical miles—or 1,150 statute miles. The technology behind the cannon is described as “cutting edge" that's so advanced that the service is not sure if the gun would be affordable.
The Army is set to conduct an early test of a key tech component at Naval Support Facility Dahlgren in Virginia “very soon.” NSF Dahlgren was the home of the Navy’s electromagnetic railgun program, before the gun was shipped out to White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico for additional testing.
Exactly how the U.S. Army intends to field a cannon with a range of 1,150 miles is unknown. The Army’s heaviest gun, the 155-millimeter gun on the M109A6 Paladin self-propelled howitzer, has a range of just 25 miles. The largest gun ever built, Schwerer Gustav, had a range of 28 miles. In the late 1980s, Canadian engineer Gerald Bull oversaw construction of the System 350 heavy gun for Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Built into the side of a hill, System 350 had a barrel diameter of 350 millimeters and could lob a 300 pound projectile with 33 pounds of high explosives up to 265 miles. Gerald Bull was assassinated in 1990 and System 350 was never completed.
Ordinary artillery guns work by loading an artillery shell, followed by a powder charge, into the gun’s breech. When the gun is fired, burning powder charges create huge amounts of pressure behind the shell. As the pressure builds up, the shell is pushed out of the barrel and down range toward the target.
A 2018 report on the “thousand mile gun” suggests that it is probably a really big gun that fires a rocket-assisted projectile (RAP). At the time, Rafferty said the gun was based on proven principles and that “we’re scaling up things that we’re already doing.” A rocket-assisted projectile incorporates a rocket motor into the base of an artillery shell. The result is a shell with a smaller explosive charge but longer range. A larger diameter artillery shell could carry a large payload of solid rocket fuel, vastly increasing the projectile’s range.
Could the long range gun be an adaptation of the Navy’s railgun? It’s unlikely. Railguns, as powerful as they are, likely can’t fling something 1,150 miles. Railguns also need lots of energy, and it’s easier to get that energy from burning bags of chemicals than from a megawatt-sized power source. Another clue is the Army’s comment that the projectiles themselves could cost up $400,000 to $500,000 each: railgun projectiles are simple and inexpensive, while rocket engines are significantly more expensive.
As the services shift focus away from guerrilla warfare to great power competition, the Army is planning to use the long range cannon against major potential adversaries. The long range gun would give the Army an unprecedented ability to hit long range targets without calling on other services, particularly the U.S. Air Force, to engage them.
The Army aims to have a prototype ready by 2023 and will then decide if it wants to fully develop the gun for service.
Oh, well then.
By all means, let's not call on other services.
I am sure our leakers have given plans to China. This is amazing.
Didn’t the Germans already try their version of this? This seems like an idea to make consultants a lot of money for an idea that will never see reality.
The army should buy it’s own cruise missiles.
The Harbor Freight version will do half the range and maybe work a couple of times.
Put it on a tank.
A bunch of Chinese generals and staff officers just crapped their pants. My Lord that’s an unbelievable range!
Didn’t mention Bulls work for the US where they built a 16” naval gun with extended barrel lengths attached and were able to send a sabot encased projectile into space to low earth orbit altitudes but not fast enough to actually stay in orbit.
An underground nuclear test sent a manhole cover into space so fast as to achieve escape velocity out of earth orbit and far past the moons orbit.
My son calls Harbor Freight … Horrible Freight
That's along the lines of what I was thinking: how is this a cannon and not a missile launcher?
Isn’t this called an IRBM?
Maybe the brass have watched too many 80s GI Joe cartoons.
Put it on a transport/passenger aircraft . . .backwards of course!
1,000+mile , low CO2 emission flights! Certain to get the approval of climate alarmists.
”Kind of reminds me of “Atomic Annie” in terms of practicality.”
Or the German Railway guns.These weapons may sound good on paper but they become very vulnerable as soon as that first shot is fired.
Does the Army believe they are only capable of counter battery fire?
I’m sure this artillery piece will follow the last one tha the Congress got smart about and refused to fund.
I remember in the run-up to Desert Storm reading that Saddam Hussein was working on a huge cannon with a nasty range. The barrel was about as long as I can hit a pitching wedge off a level fairway lie.
Where will tye test fire this thing???
A 1000 mi arty piece. I believe they call that a Tomahawk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.