Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Walker

The problem with prosecuting him before any others is that the prosecution would have to present evidence that may jeopardize any or all of their open investigations. From the looks of how this may shake out, McCabe may be one if the smaller fish.


McCabe was referred for prosecution for leaking during the Obama admin. Nothing coup related at all. Despite that the “Trump” DOJ have played political football with him for over a year. The bottom line is nobody in the DOJ wants to prosecute McCabe to the benefit of Trump. It’s that simple.


72 posted on 10/21/2019 3:47:46 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: lodi90
McCabe was referred for prosecution for leaking during the Obama admin. Nothing coup related at all. Despite that the “Trump” DOJ have played political football with him for over a year. The bottom line is nobody in the DOJ wants to prosecute McCabe to the benefit of Trump. It’s that simple.

I’m not sure it is that simple; we have no idea what kind of discussions are taking place behind closed doors. McCabe certainly doesn’t want to be indicted, and we don’t know if he is giving up information or not.

To be clear, I have no idea (or optimism) about where this is going to end.

But as long as there is an active investigation underway, I think it’s a mistake to assume that there is a cover-up in place.

77 posted on 10/21/2019 4:02:57 PM PDT by Captain Walker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson