Bootygig is on today to push his narrative and for the democratic media to offer him up as an alternative to the floundering recently, in the debates and elsewhere, of:
Chief Grey Beaver: Deer-in-the-Headlights look when the other dems asked her how the Hell she’s gonna pay for all her proposals (note that each one of them also has the same problem). But her problem is she freezes when challenged. Trump would kill her!
Creepy, corrupty, Ole Joe: He’s not coming out of this and passing like a envelope stuffed with foreign cash going into Hunter’s inside suit pocket.
Beta: Can’t keep his big mouth shut vis-à-vis the agenda.
Kamamlatoe: She’s been Tulsified.
Burnie: Might turn out as front runner. He’s the guy the drivebys are trying to use Bootygig to challenge.
Tulsi: Dear Comrade, Hillary’s setting you up, and the drivebys are relieved...
Spartacus, Yang, et al: Not a chance...
I watched her Norfolk VA performance on C-SPAN. She was asked one of those generic softball questions by some shill in the audiene, something like what was the one thing that most impacted your life.
First she paced up and down the stage rubbing her nose. She said "besides marrying George?" or whoever, forgot the name, she was pointing to her husband. The audience booed. They dislike marriage I guess. Then she caved and said, it was the thing I talked about, referring to her previous jabber about how she was 19 and married to a different guy but decided to go back to school instead of becoming a housewife or something like that. It wasn't really an answer to the question because it wasn't a "one thing" And she kept staring and pointing at the questioner even as she didn't answer the questioner. It was creepy..
Then she morphed from that anecdoatal drivel into her memorized wrap up speech which was this: other politicians told her that she should not get wonky with her audiences. They said that was too hard for people to understand. Warren then relates how it was too hard for abolitionists, suffragettes, civil rights workers, "LGBT asterisk" advocating for "real marriage". And thus it isn't really too hard for people to understand her leftist wonk talking points? No, people know exactly what that is: leftist dogma.
In other words a bunch of progressive crap that has nothing to do with her style as a boring progressive wonk who nobody relates to (except 22 year old female college students). It's ok to rub your nose and spout liberal talking points when you have a friendly audience. But in a national debate she has to answer the questions with an answer that is actually related to the question. She has to relate to the working class Trump voters. She can do neither.
Ah yes, young Master Beta.