| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 10/14/2019 12:27:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3786067/posts |
Posted on 10/14/2019 12:14:49 PM PDT by libstripper
House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, stands at the center of the impeachment of the president scam.
And as word gets out about his real game and how he got it — through a spying operation aimed at the White House that he directed, he's starting to get weirdly wobbly. Two instances just from the weekend are starting to stand out.
First, in stark contrast to the big hullabaloo he made about hearing from the so-called "whistleblower" in Congress ahead of the planned Trump execution, Schiff suddenly doesn't think the whistleblower is so very, very necessary to testify at his hearings at all:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He should also as his Ed Buck activities are starting to come out a little here and there.
What if there never was a “whistleblower?” Schiff & Pelosi could have made up this story, as they’ve lied about everything else.
He’ll be more nervous his first night in the pen with Bubba.
He’s a lying scum. He’s too stupid to get nervous.
“What if there never was a “whistleblower?””
Puts ‘em between a rock and a hard place if there’s none. Will someone have to play the role? Does someone die, then be named “the whistleblower”? Hmm...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.