Instead of having intellectual curiosity and looking the mysterious, coincidental "whistle blower," Fox just let their impeachment monkeys run wild over the last few weeks.
“Instead of having intellectual curiosity and looking the mysterious, coincidental “whistle blower,” Fox just...”
And they continue to display such journalistic malfeasance. Or maybe the “journalists” of our time lack common sense or critical thinking skills ... no longer taught in our schools.
Now that they have Schiftt on the record as saying “more clear”, a high school journalism student would have known to pounce.... like... “Why not totally clear instead of “more clear”? That “more clear” still sounds dishonest.” .... “”You alleged having facts regarding illegal Russian collusion against POTUS, an issue without your “facts” ever being disclosed, turned out to false ... why should you not be considered as “The Boy Who Cried Wolf?” one too many times here? ....”Since you covered up your office’s relationship with the “Whistleblower” prior to the complaint being filed, some could say your office coerced the complaint to be made against POTUS. Why should you not step down as chairman of your committee because you and your staff are now fact witnesses, biased in the outcome of the issue? SHould you recuse yourself to be able to vote on any impeachment question because of your involvement - you cannot be a witness and factfinder (juror)?”