Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
It seemed odd as I read that article that the author switched from arguing against war with Turkey to arguing for war with Iran. Why not both? Well no that would be double-stupid. Why not neither? Now you are talking.

Trump wants Iran to stop attacking Israel, stop building nukes, and mostly stop building missiles. That requires a credible threat of war but not a strike or two like the author envisions. Rather it is a pressure dampaign backed up with strong defense keeping Iran in a non-nuke box.

As for the Saudi radical Islamic royal family, the best we can do is keep them in their box but allow them to defend that box and help if necessary. Remember the lesson of the Cash Hoagie story: the anti-Saudis of which there are a variety, want to destabilize Saudi. That would have huge and awful consequences for the ME.

17 posted on 10/12/2019 11:59:21 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways to Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
It seemed odd as I read that article that the author switched from arguing against war with Turkey to arguing for war with Iran.

I think you’ll find that going to war with Iran is Ms. Glick’s solution to a lot of the world’s problems.

23 posted on 10/13/2019 6:12:04 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson