Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrEdd
That fits with what I was saying. Calling gender a “construct” (meaning: all in the mind) is just a non-judgmental way of calling it a subset of fetishes (also, all in the mind). I prefer to stick to gender = construct; sex = biology; because it's backed up by the dictionaries. I.e., it's actually the correct word usage; while conflating the two is wrong at best, and often devious (intended to muddle things. Substituting fetishes for gender is more likely to provoke arguments than it is to convince — so, the word usage depends on your audience. If they can't be convinced, you might as well get your digs in.
37 posted on 10/12/2019 2:41:00 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

It is my intention to provoke an attempt to deny that gender is just a set of fetishes. I point it out calmly and rationally.

I never lose that argument, and if they become angry and begin lashing out then any bystanders to the conversation sees them as angry and unreasonable.

It elicits the response socialists hope to benefit from when they send provocateurs to peaceful gatherings of patriots and attempt to evoke a violent response to what they do.


39 posted on 10/12/2019 3:05:45 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson