Posted on 10/09/2019 10:28:07 AM PDT by billorites
I've grown increasingly curious — hell, let's say suspicious — about the most recent incarnation of the three-year effort to find a case for impeaching Trump. "
edit...
It seems Trump asked Zelensky for two things: an investigation into Crowdstrike, the company that performed the forensic examination of the DNC servers in lieu of the FBI, and to co-operate in investigating the Bidens, pere et fils, involvement in the suspended prosecution of Ukrainian company Burisma, which employed Hunter Biden. This is what is supposed to have been "crazy" and "frightening" left Whistle-Blower2 "visibly shaken."
Now, what could have been so emotionally charged in that call? The transcript seems relatively low key: no shouting, no screaming, and if there were any threats they were phrased very diplomatically.
It seems to me — and this is just a plausible inference, I'm not asserting it's the truth — it seems to me that the only people who would be "visibly shaken" by that would be someone who already has guilty knowledge of Crowdstrike, Burisma, or both.
Now, look at the really just astonishing irregularity of the "impeachment inquiry": not just refusing to take it to the floor of the House, but the secrecy, the selective cherry-picking of releases, and the plan to prevent Republican members — not to mention the Nation — from learning anything about either WB1 or WB2.
I think the most plausible inference is that the whistleblowers are connected to Biden's campaign, or to the DNC, and were shaken by the possibility of Biden and Crowdstrike being investigated because they know there is something there to be found.
It's time for the Democrat majority on HPSCI to come clean: what did they know, when did they know it, and who are they really protecting with their unprecedented secrecy?
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Who might be “owned” by the Russians. Or at least friendly to Russia. Remember that Russia interfered with the 2016 elections.
Astute observers already know that the “evidence” that Russians leaked the DNC emails was planted in the “Guccifer 2.0” releases, most likely by Crowdstrike.
Access to the server would prove that, and also probably prove that there was no real evidence that Russians even hacked the server either.
So much of the fake “Russiagate” narrative was built on those 2 assertions that came from Crowdstrike. If they are proven to be lies, then it becomes obvious that the whole fraud was planned out long in advance, before Fusion GPS or anyone else got involved.
Maybe because they know that Russia didn’t hack into the server and they have nothing to worry about with Russia.
To be honest I’m surprised Hillary didn’t ground up the server into dust. Unless she has blackmail information on the server that she can use against her enemies.
All nations interfere with all election of other nations. That’s what nations do.
That would be like the GW Bush “USAF Form” that read like an oral history from a phone call or interview, transcribed when convenient to the USAF personnel records with a PC using MSWord.
They (the whistleblower’s handlers - which is why they don’t want us to know who the whistleblower actually is!) merely wrote down what they “thought” happened during the phone call. What they wanted to hear, not what was said.
Trump released the transcript, and they have no case - except to claim the transcript is a lie!
And, by the way, how can they claim that Biden’s interfering in the Ukrainian prosecutor is a “debunked conspiracy theory”? Biden is on tape saying he did it!
Biden and son caught with their hands in the till......"just playing tiddly-winks"......
Who?
Clinton machine
Of course.
if not a real person, who signed it, who did the ig interview and who did schiff’s staff talk to along with where did the ny slimes get their info?
Now, what committee is Shiff the head of? Who is the primary focus of their oversight? Who is the rumor blower supposed to work for? Describe the rumor blower to me. Height, weight, color of eyes, color of hair?
so what about the WB’s attorney..if there is no WB they are in deep caca...now same attorneys are representing WB #2
is WB #2 real?
NY times described job etc, ig described that wB was political etc.. if supposedly talked to one of the people who told WB about call.. Name on signature line should have been verified, as well as past employment..thus WB imo is either real or impersonator...
Neither Rumor Blower is real. Both are creations of wishful thinking and rumors spread about the caricature of Trump that they've built with hatred and chewing gum along with a large splash of being insulted over the deplorables daring to elect someone who isn't a member of the Deep State club.
As for caring about attorneys representing the, so what? They can say they handled everything in writing, over the phone, or through intermediaries, follow that with"attorney client privilege" and they won't be touched or even subjected to harsh language.
Find and watch the movie, "Body of Lies" which has a good portrayal of how people can made to look like players in one arena when they're not really even involved.
From that maybe you'll understand how they can create some person to attribute things to and only come up with a living, breathing, human being to play the role if something unexpected happens.
i know how things can be done, but I would be extremely disappointed if the WB never appeared in person to ig, attorney ny times, schiff’s staff..to far a bridge for me to cross...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.