From the complaint released, which I believe was the form released to congress, there were NO first-hand items. The fact that the ICIG claims to have found first hand knowledge is unsupported by the evidence on record, which is the major issue I have had with your acceptance of the assertion at face value, FRiend.
If only the defendant in an accusation is required to present actual evidence, there is no justice, and there must be no acceptance.
I don't know what the IG found, only what he says. It's an official statement from a Trump appointee but he could be lying.
My issue has always been with Davis and the politicians who play us for fools. This whole changed form narrative has been a distraction.
No one disputes that the WB used the old form.