[semimojo]

Unless the Whistleblower DID clain to have first hand information.

He did. Read the ICIG statement.

Where is the quid-pro-quo in the exchange? 

I don't know but that's an issue for Congress, not the whistleblower or the IG.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: He did. Read the ICIG statement.

OK he did. But WHAT first hand knowledge?

We can all say that we now have first hand knowledge since the transcript was released.

So, if THAT transcript is NOT what the whistleblower was referring to when he claimed first hand knowledge, what OTHER thing is he referring to and why don’t we know about it? ( does it even exist ? ).

[rolling_stone]

so did they go through proper procedures to change the form?