RE: First hand knowledge isn’t required for a whistleblower report under the law.
So, you are saying that the back dating is simply a form adjustment to fit the pre-existing US Code?
I don't know about back dating one way or the other.
I do know that it doesn't matter in this case because the whistleblower used the old form that had been in place since May 2018.
Despite all of the innuendo I haven't seen Davis or any Comgresspeople dispute this.