Laz will find this interesting....
The "journalist" who wrote this article apparently has no understanding of the subjunctive mood.
JB doesn't understand the issue, therefore one cannot insist that "JB understands...."
Regards,
Oh. The title, “Justice,” confused me. Thank goodness, it isn’t about our Supreme Court. We’re somewhat okay for now in that way. Need one more good man like Kavanaugh.
And I hope, women encountering this man have a fundamental right to hit him in the head with a frying pan.
CC
This coming from a women judge and which leaves the door open for the illegals and Muslim invader rapists, “ my client your honor didn’t understand the word consent” or the word NO
I saw the term “InCel” used in an article last week, referring to the kind of person that might shoot up a movie theater. Those in power to make up new words the media likes to use, say it stands for “Involuntary Celibate”. Or basically, A man without a girlfriend that isn’t gay...
Goes along with that imam who said it was okay to have sex with a nine year old provided they were married if only for an hour before divorcing her.
An expansion of the Muslim Rapist Automatic Exoneration Rule.
The judge is an imbecile. Autism has no correlation with low intelligence. In fact, people on the spectrum tend to be in the upper ranges..
Now the U.K. can begin to quit charging sexual assault crimes against “immigrants” who come from cultures where it is not understood that consent is required for sexual relations. My guess is that is the motive here. If one “natural inability” to understand consent is accepted, others WILL follow. The slippery slide in the law works its evil every time.
This is an uncomfortable verdict because it basically addresses the fact that mentally-retarded individuals are horny just like the rest of us, an unpleasant detail that most people would rather not discuss.
Do the women have the right to defend themselves from his unwanted advances?