Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAJOR CLIMATE PAPER WITHDRAWN BY NATURE
GWPF.com ^

Posted on 10/02/2019 4:12:15 PM PDT by ameribbean expat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: dsc

So much for Princeton University being a good school. If they are teaching/working at this level the statistics are the easy part. They are just frauds.


21 posted on 10/02/2019 5:29:33 PM PDT by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gunnut
It likely made the nightly news when the study came out but will be nothing but crickets when the retraction comes.

Oh, the humanity! Couple of days ago the theory that eating man-food like beef and pork causes cancer was blown up by a huge, international study conducted over many years that found zero (that's with a "0") contribution to cancer risk. Big story on it by Gina Kolata in the NYT, no less!

The only palliative the editors could muster was a final, boring 3-4 paragraphs on how maybe people should STILL not eat beef and pork because all the cow and pig farts from farming our food will make the world end by global warming.

No, really. The story ended with that. AND NOW THE SCIENTISTS ARE TRYING TO TAKE AWAY OUR GLOBAL WARMING, TOO?

22 posted on 10/02/2019 5:35:13 PM PDT by SamuraiScot (am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


23 posted on 10/02/2019 5:35:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Btt


24 posted on 10/02/2019 5:43:35 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Did Michael Mann (the (horse)hockey stick guy) do the “statistical analysis”?


25 posted on 10/02/2019 5:47:32 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

I have learned way too late on life that those who are paid for their knowledge are not also priveledged to have independent thoughts on said topic


26 posted on 10/02/2019 5:49:52 PM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

An oversight, a one off no doubt /s. Err no, Michael Mann the Grandfather of Climate change is a proven fraud and lost in Court just a couple months ago to that effect. Of course few no that as it was buried.


27 posted on 10/02/2019 7:13:31 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

My message for Dear Comrade Laure

Statistics aren’t that difficult.... Your “error” makes an objective person go hummmm??

At the very least an embarrassment for the “prestigious” Princeton. Nice job!

Send your own congratulations.

laurer@princeton.edu


28 posted on 10/02/2019 7:32:24 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat
Nicholas Lewis, the "amateur climate scientist" who found the errors, posts about this in wattsupwiththat.com:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/25/resplandy-et-al-part-5-final-outcome/

29 posted on 10/02/2019 10:02:07 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

found major errors AKA lies


30 posted on 10/03/2019 3:30:47 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (nicdip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“In small clannish fields like “climate science” the rule is now not peer review but pal review.
They all know each other, and there is great mutual backscratching taking the place of critical evaluation.”

You are absolutely spot on, and there are a fair number of ‘clannish fields’. Further, the ‘connections’ go beyond reviewers etc. The web of connections includes insiders at the NIH and other government agencies. Insiders in positions of influence have a lot of ways to ensure favorable reviews and to direct grant money to their friends etc.


31 posted on 10/03/2019 8:49:56 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glasseye

“These people are ‘research grant whores’.”

Yes. They are often self-promoting careerists who travel the world on tax payer-derived grant money, philanthropic money, and money from universities who generally don’t pay taxes.


32 posted on 10/03/2019 8:55:44 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson