Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie

I might agree for allowing a federal bailout if:

1. Complete federal takeover of the state, its essentially reduced back to territorial status,

2. Complete audit of state holdings & methods of revenue generation. A plan for a path to solvency is implemented and put in place to act for 4 years. No internal state/territory legislature can change it!

3. Current state government invalidated to include all contracts, labor agreemens & state government positions,

4. State/territory can not return to full state status until solvency is reached. Option of breaking up the state into smaller more “financially” governable units if no other methods to reach solvency.

All completely likely unconstitutional. Maybe something like could be implemented within Constitutional boundaries.


13 posted on 10/02/2019 11:50:57 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

I agree but I don’t see it being prohibited in the Constitution if the state agrees and I would only make new states out of the red counties, keep the blue hell holes as territories until they have been reformed.


28 posted on 10/02/2019 2:11:35 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

“All completely likely unconstitutional. Maybe something like could be implemented within Constitutional boundaries.”

Dust off the 1867-68 Reconstruction Act. It was legally implemented and enforced.


30 posted on 10/02/2019 3:41:14 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson