[hanamizu]

The question was NEVER if Hunter Biden violated any laws.

---

Who knows with Ukraine’s legal system. But if the Huntster was hired so his daddy (that would be the then VP of the US, Quid Pro Joe) could see to it that an investigation into the company was quashed, that might be a good thing to know about. That might violate a US law or two. If it could be shown that Biden, the elder, had the prosecutor fired for his son’s benefit, I’m pretty sure there’d be a statute against that sort of thing.

[Wuli]

But in order to get there, no one needed to start out suggesting Hunter Biden erred. All that was legally pertinent was the question of the propriety of Biden senior pressuring Ukraine to fire the prosecutor. THAT legitimate question, if it was properly investigated COULD, POSSIBLY lead investigators, in time, to evidence of shenanigans by Biden junior. But getting there did not require starting with that suggestion, and Trump did not make that suggestion - only what was the deal with Biden senior getting someone fired.