must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant wasn’t acting in self-defense.
Sounds like an impossibility to me, since she Went into Someone else home with her Gun Drawn and Murdered the Occupant who happened to live there.
They should have Arrested and Prosecuted the Investigators that “Saw no Crime” as accessories after the fact to Capital Murder.
I would think walking into someone else's apartment uninvited and unannounced would take "self-defense" off the table.
She wanted it both ways. Says she drew her gun because of police training. Did not follow her police training to call for back up
If only the defense of a female cop was one that every homeowner would be able to use in their shooting defenses.
The state does its best to crucify regular peons defending themselves from criminals and invaders, they never bend over backwards to see them as innocent.
If this man shot this female cop breaking into his home and killed her, would the state be so receptive to his legal team arguing the same thing? Hell no, you know they wouldn’t.
She shot an unarmed man sitting on his couch. Where was the threat to her that required the act of self defense?