Good, thanks.
Here is what appears to be an objective description of the process that applies to Presidential calls with foreign leaders:
https://projects.voanews.com/leaked-transcripts/
This CIA Brennan hack is not a whistleblower.
He or She is a liar and a leaker.
And was sent to spy on Trump.
They should be treated as such.
It reads like a collaborated hit piece on a sitting president, not a Whistle Blower report
Upshot: were Trump to do exactly the same thing regarding someone he had absolutely no personal interest in, it would be construed as perfectly reasonable.
As in: sitting President notes a citizen bragged publicly about criminally interfering in a foreign criminal investigation, President suggests to new leader the investigation be resumed.
As in: a domestic criminal investigation was weirdly subverted & ended, and President suggests the new leader look into rumors of overlooked evidence.
Funny how the report overlooks Biden’s admitted criminal activity, and construes normal diplomacy as inherently bad.
Thanks for posting. I was also tired of trying to find a clean copy and I wasn’t about to rely on someone else telling me it said.
This wasn’t written by any run of the mill person sitting on a bar stool after work one night. This is someone definitely familiar with the protocol of writing that kind of letter.
But I thought the complaintant wrote it to the IG - this is to the chairmen...
TY for posting.
“Somebody did something.”