Because the Whistleblowhard law protects even partisan mole complaints.
I have no issue with Whistleblowers, they need protection however: I have an issue with someone who has no first hand knowledge of ANY wrongdoing and now we have flipp’in Rats using this to try to influence the public. The MSM is complicit because they simply hate the man. I am so ashamed of this charade.
It’s all about what they (the Democrats, mostly) assume. They assume that credible = truth. They assume that the evidence came from a real whistleblower with first-hand information. They assume that the DNI or the WH were attempting to cover up this transcript. It’s easy when you can assume and the Media never makes you prove it.
OTOH, we have a tape of Joe Biden describing his strong-arm tactics with the Ukraine in minute detail. And what does the Media say? “There is no proof”
1984 anyone?