[KC Burke]

The watch-dog agency staff that reviewed the complaint determined:

1.) He does not qualify under the Intel Community Whistle Blower Act as a “Whisle Blower” as the person he is reporting about is not an employee of an intel agency — a requirement in the Act.

2.) He was determined to have political motivation.

So, ergo, he is a Leaker and a Leaker about Presidential Communications.

[rxsid]

"The watch-dog agency staff that reviewed the complaint determined:

1.) He does not qualify under the Intel Community Whistle Blower Act as a “Whisle Blower” as the person he is reporting about is not an employee of an intel agency — a requirement in the Act.

2.) He was determined to have political motivation.

So, ergo, he is a Leaker and a Leaker about Presidential Communications."

This "whistle blower" needs to be charged with Sedition.

Until someone pays a steeper price other than loosing their job, this coup attempt will continue unabated.

[familyop]

"The watch-dog agency staff that reviewed the complaint determined:

1.) He does not qualify under the Intel Community Whistle Blower Act as a “Whisle Blower” as the person he is reporting about is not an employee of an intel agency — a requirement in the Act.

2.) He was determined to have political motivation.

So, ergo, he is a Leaker and a Leaker about Presidential Communications."

Thanks, KC Burke! Show us the leaker! America wants to see the gossip-monger and false accuser! Also here, from three days ago,...

Why Are We Calling Ukraine Story Leaker A Whistleblower?
https://hotair.com/archives/karen-townsend/2019/09/23/calling-ukraine-story-leaker-whistleblower/

The leaker's complaint is here.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf