I don’t know if you were saying this, but is there even a whistle-blower? Did the dems make this up, hoping to impeach on such weak sauce and hop that this mysterious whistle-blower won’t have to testify?
That’s my opinion. They want to cause procedural “crimes” - any mistreatment of a “whistle-blower”, or at least distort the meaning of the protections it offers, to claim guilt of something....while hiding and protecting the person.
That they concede this “person” didn’t actually hear the conversation themselves means this “person” can’t qualify as a “whistle-blower”, it makes no sense. So it has to be this “person” is just a ghost. A real person would have no teeth, they’d only get dragged through the mud only to declare they never heard anything, just hearsay. Then would be pressured to disclose who told them.
Even if PDJT did threaten to withhold something to advance an agenda, that doesn’t make it criminal. As there is ample evidence of the Biden family engaging in crimes it would be improper to not investigate. Just because Biden is competing for a political office should not obstruct justice being served, if appropriate. If they’re going to claim what PDJT said (claim) then the same is true for Biden, except it involved his son being paid absurd money...a complete conflict of interest.
My guess....RBG must be on her last breath - this came out of nowhere and, yet again, has zero evidence of any wrongdoing, just innuendo and speculation leading to tantrums! The only other matter might be to just deflect from Biden & son money laundering, except if true, they’ve only brought attention TO the problem....but then they’re demonic, mentally ill, and can’t help themselves! Trump must go!
“I don’t know if you were saying this, but is there even a whistle-blower?”
No, a political partisan not a whistleblower. That’s good enough for the Rats and this political operation: Russia Collusion Hoax 2, Ukraine version.
LS believes it’s a crony close to John Brennan.