Posted on 09/23/2019 8:29:16 AM PDT by Liberty7732
he question begs to be asked: Why is the person who came forward with a story about President Trump and a telephone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky still being referred to as a whistleblower?
Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, Michael Atkinson, is a Trump appointee. Allegedly he found a reason to go forward with a complaint lodged against President Trump stemming from a conversation with Zelensky in July. The anonymous whistleblower, as it turns out, is not, in fact, a whistleblower. The complainant is essentially a gossipmonger. The person admits no direct knowledge of the conversation. Doesnt that seem to be an important fact in this whole story?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
“Why Are We Calling Ukraine Story Leaker A Whistleblower?”
To avoid their name becoming “public”. We can’t reveal the name of a “whistle blower”!
Because “phony” is so judgmental.
I’m taking a different tack on this. I believe Trump wants this Whistleblower label to stir up this whole controversy. The media cant resist this bait, so it is all over the news. Otherwise, they would have been completely quite about any wrong doing by Biden. There is no downside on this story for Trump. Both Biden and the media will take the hit on this.
Because that is the narrative the rats went with.
Maybe, but Schiff was the first to talk about it publicly that I know of. Not the media.
Actually, we didnt know much of anything about it until after the IG testified to the House. By then lots of people could have leaked it.
For the same reason the liberals refer to a homosexual as a gay person. Misnomer of tragic proportions because I never met a homosexual that was happy. They were all miserable human beings who were depressed most of the time. Some to the verge of suicide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.