Posted on 09/21/2019 1:52:18 PM PDT by Innovative
A New York judge on Friday ordered President Donald Trump to provide video testimony as part of an upcoming lawsuit brought by protesters who say they were assaulted by Trump's security guards during a 2015 protest outside of Trump Tower.
Judge Doris M. Gonzalez wrote in her ruling that Trump's testimony is "indispensable" to the trial and so he must provide video testimony before the trial is set to begin Thursday. The Washington Post first reported the judge's ruling.
The trial centers around a protest in September 2015 in front of Trump Tower in New York City where two protesters wore parody Ku Klux Klan outfits to protest Trump's rhetoric on illegal immigration, according to the initial court filing.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Yep, Trump’s security was apparently Antifa-ing some Fascist haters.
The judiciary has turned into a nightmare. The founders’ should have dragged Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall out of the courthouse & bandished him.
Marshall aggressively took the courts way beyond any mandate that was envisioned. By the end of his term, the poison was already well established in the nation.
Dorie the Clowncan GFH.
Dorie the Clown can GFH.
keep your pants on!
She’s a state judge!
She has no more authority of the President then a Justice of the Peace.
http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=450
This **** is nothing new for New York. Read Tom Wolf's The Bonfire of the Vanities for a refresher.
Party ........ Candidate
Democratic La Tia W. Martin
Democratic Doris M. Gonzalez
Democratic Donald A. Miles
Source: New York State Board of Elections, "2016 General Election Unofficial Results," accessed November 9, 2016
[they all ran without opposition...]
I got ya. I’m just grumbling about the state of the courts in general.
It’s rubbish ruling after rubish ruling day after day, on every level. It’s distorted the whole purpose of a republic.
Sounds like another “wise Latina”.
I didnt say it was right. I simply pointed out the fact that a sitting president can be made to testify, which is what the poster seemed to be saying cant happen. It can-whether you like it or not.
Pretty common phrase in downstate Illinois.
Doris can ESAD.
Executive Privilege.
End of story.
Yeah but the rats & media (same thing) will spin this as obstruction of justice/Impeach1 bs
So I still do not understand or it is not clear why this Judge feels Trumps testimony is important..........Anyone know?
There was a legit argument that Clinton shouldnt have deigned to testify. But for sure, he should not have testified with the intention of beating the rap.Evidently he was, in historical hindsight, guilty. He should have settled.
But he thought that it was politic to beat the rap instead. And what a Democrat - especially a Clinton - thinks is politic is what a Democrat will do. And thus, he dishonored his presidency.
Testimony of three words... “I wasn’t there”. lol
The President’s lawyers will tell Doris the commie to pound sand. LOLOL
Unless he was a physical eye witness at the scene it’s not. This is just harassment.
“I wasn’t there” is all I would say and be done with it.
“””Unless he was a physical eye witness at the scene its not. This is just harassment.
I wasnt there is all I would say and be done with it.”””
Thank you for your answer!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.