The law to ban and seize upon owners death, AR-15s, may not stand up in court, because there is no factual connection between “death by firearm” statistics and the AR-15. The vast majority of gun deaths in Canada are by hand gun.
There is no reason to ban AR-15s other than emotion not supported by fact. Therefore any law banning the AR-15 is consequently capricious and arbitrary, and will not stand the test of litigation and time.
There are thousands of AR-15 owners in Canada. To seize them upon the owners death, they will have to find them, a doubtful proposition, actually, almost impossible to enforce without payment for such expropriated property; and justifiable reason for owners and their survivors to hide them from the authorities according to various Provincial personal property laws designed to prevent the arbitrary, capricious seizure of personal property by government.
We have been through all this before over the hundreds of years of common law history. The British government tried to disarm the Scots but the swords, spears and pikes were hidden and could not be seized from the Highlands. So the people of Canada, many who are Highlander descendents, know what to do to combat a vexatious and capricious government from taking their property.The examples from our history are legion. Canadians know what to do exactly if this law passes.