Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eyedigress

“6-27-2019

Of course not.”


What’s your point supposed to be?

I don’t like her “moral” opposition to the death penalty.
It indicates logical and philosophical issues that are not good.
It tells me she is likely to turn out to be a liberal in other areas in addition to being wrong on what is an important issue.

Try debating the issue instead of attacking me for having recently joined.


47 posted on 09/20/2019 5:54:06 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Farcesensitive

OK. “What you see in the article, you don’t like”.

Go Ahead.


68 posted on 09/20/2019 6:45:49 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Farcesensitive

Being morally opposed to the death penalty is a different issue from whether it’s constitutionally permissible. She’s entitled to be opposed to it, as long as her personal views don’t determine her view of whether it is permitted by the Constitution.

That;s the issue judges are supposed to rule on, not whether they’d vote for something if they were legislators.


142 posted on 09/23/2019 9:29:55 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson