[Hugh the Scot]

My initial post encapsulated my entire opinion on this topic. Apparently you’re at least partially in agreement with me as well.

The entirety of his opinion piece was based on her being Catholic (and the Pope), and if his intent was to do otherwise, he failed because he’s an idiot.

Has she recused herself from any relevant cases? If so, the author failed to mention any of them.

I’m not invested one way or another in Amy Coney Barrett I’m interested in conservative and constitutional jurisprudence, and as I’ve repeatedly stated, the author has not provided a shred of evidence that she would provide anything less, or named any judicial candidate who would provide more.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Well, perhaps you'll join me in hoping Barrett would NOT recuse herself from all cases which touch upon matters of Christian conscience (as she said she would).

In such cases, we'd hope she would rule Constitutionally, and--- separately --- speak up loud and clear, personally, if she thought the law to be Constitutional, but immoral.

Otherwise, we really *would* see the exclusion of people of faith from serving in courts of law.