The question as to whether a law or a decision is in keeping with the Constitution, properly the subject of review by an appellate panel, is not the same as whether a judge on that panel, if sitting as a trial judge, would impose the death penalty.
I’m sorry but I believe that is a misguided conclusion based on an obtuse line of reasoning.
She has basically stated that this (intuit ANY) judicial decision whereby the dictates of law conflict with her “conscience/moral principles”, recusal is demanded.