No queer can be socially conservative. Not possible to be both.
That’s why Jesus said a man cannot serve two masters. Lincoln said a House cannot stay divided.
It will eventually come down to one or the other.
I’m not interested in whether he is socially conservative. I am interested in whether he is a judicial conservative. What two consenting adults do in private may be a good subject for a sermon in church, but it’s a lousy one for the law. He sounds like a solid candidate for an important position. His personal life is none of my business.