Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/19/2019 7:41:39 AM PDT by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: karpov

Butt, butt, butt............... Where’s the ‘prop 65’ warning on this message? I thought anything in regards to kali had to have the prop 65 warning on it.


2 posted on 09/19/2019 7:43:36 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
California intends to sue to enforce its own rules, and the Supreme Court may have an opportunity to consider the case before the end of President Trump’s term. If that happens, the Justices might also consider setting guardrails on Massachusetts v. EPA, which liberals have invoked to demand climate regulation not authorized by Congress.

...might also consider setting guardrails on Massachusetts v. EPA

You... you've got nice little dicta going for you... We wouldn't want anything to happen to it...
Would be a real shame.

3 posted on 09/19/2019 8:09:14 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT ("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

I say the feds need to stay out of it. States rights.


4 posted on 09/19/2019 8:11:59 AM PDT by maxtheripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

bkmk


6 posted on 09/19/2019 8:33:38 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
NPR was going full bore propaganda about it this morning. They even had Gavin Nuisance on explaining how Cali is in better shape the the Trump led Feds.
8 posted on 09/19/2019 8:52:35 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

The 1970 law granted California the ability to ask for a waiver from strictly federal controls on tailpipe emissions, but it did not mandate that the waiver had to be approved, and the waiver itself was conditioned on special needs regarding the pollutants coming from automobile exhaust, which have largely been equaled and taken care of now by federal standards. Also, the law did not classify CO2 as a pollutant nor mandate its coverage in any automobile standards. Obama tried to rewrite the law by executive fiat to include CO2. He won that argument, temporarily in a Supreme Court case, which the Trump administration is also contesting.

The entire current episode is that California has been able to cajole the major automakers to bend to its will on new standards, which would result in California’s standard becoming the de facto national standard, lest the automakers have to manufacture one set of cars for California and another set for the rest of the country.

Trump is right to withdraw the waiver. It’s original intent is no longer germane.


11 posted on 09/19/2019 9:34:53 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

What is left out of this discussion is that the environment in the west is different than in the east. What causes smog in the west is directly opposite than in the east. The catalytic converter works in the west but makes things worst in the east.


12 posted on 09/19/2019 9:55:16 AM PDT by jimfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Electric vehicles suck

That being said Tesla are pretty sexy and fast


13 posted on 09/19/2019 10:52:28 AM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson