So what did she get, $1,200,000 or so with an agreement of 1: no admission and 2: she would not prosecute.
Since she violated her settlement, she should returned the money.
Your deflection back to a case I have already stipulated was flawed has nothing to do with the 30 or more other credible accusations. The man did something, to many. It may have been a lopsided case, and therefore not perfect justice; but neither is he an innocent lamb.