Scandalous is being generous. First the victim was drunk and doesn’t remember being “assaulted” at all, then the 7 witnesses turn out to be biased 2nd and 3rd hand accounts at best, now the co-author was present at Yale, and a classmate of Brett? And all of this omitted in the NYT story? What other shoes will drop? The NYT is losing serious credibility here. Not that they had any with me, but they were believed by many...
The latest media hit stinks of desperation, panic.
Why? Was a major USSC decision about to drop last weekend? No.
What big anti-DNC story was this hit piece aimed at smothering? I am a firm believer that the blue tick media gatekeepers cue up diversionary stories like torpedo tubes on an attack sub. They are well drilled and prepared, you have to give them that, since the days of the chad loss by Gore...
I think they thought, from reading POTUS tweets or something, that the IG report was landing last weekend.
“Look, squirrel!!” is their default tactic.