[DoodleDawg]

However, the Arizona high court’s ruling was limited to just the “creation of custom wedding invitations,” with the ruling not allowing for “a blanket exemption from the Ordinance for all of Plaintiffs’ business operations.”

Why would one facet of the business operation be protected but not others? It's all art.

[i_robot73]

>
>>
However, the Arizona high court’s ruling was limited to just the “creation of custom wedding invitations,” with the ruling not allowing for “a blanket exemption from the Ordinance for all of Plaintiffs’ business operations.”
>>
Why would one facet of the business operation be protected but not others? It’s all art.
>

It’s so the govt-law-lawyer-money mill can keep going round & round & round &....

I mean, what would govt DO if courts, @ the min., reminded the other 2 branches of its LIMITED role(s) & authority??