Posted on 09/16/2019 8:39:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The television images of homeless adults, tent cities, discarded drug paraphernalia, and filthy conditions in America’s urban landscapes are shocking. The homeless people in these scenes didn’t grow up saying, “I can’t wait to become an addict and live on the street.” Clearly, several things went wrong over the course of their lives.
For many living on the streets, the path to homelessness started early, with childhood trauma and adverse experiences.
For example, in Santa Clara County, just south of San Francisco, 78 percent of homeless adults grew up in a household with a person with drug or alcohol dependence; 65 percent endured psychological abuse as a child; and 37.5 percent experienced homelessness as children.
Considering that Federal Department of Education statistics show that nearly 1.4 million students attending public school experienced homelessness in the 2016-17 school year, 27 percent more children than in 2010-11, the alarm bells should be ringing everywhere.
This Administration needs to address the rising numbers of “street homeless,” but even greater attention needs to be directed toward helping homeless children because the consequences of their homelessness are profound.
By the time a homeless child is eight years old, one in three has a major mental disorder.
Homeless children have twice the rate of learning disabilities and three times the rate of emotional and behavioral problems. This makes them twice as likely to repeat a grade compared to non-homeless children.
Homeless children are sick at twice the rate of other children and have five times the rate of diarrhea and stomach problems – not surprising given that homeless children are twice as likely to go hungry and half experience anxiety, depression, or withdrawal. Consequently, many homeless children have great difficulty learning in school.
Without appropriate interventions, a homeless child beset with overwhelming challenges easily becomes an addicted, mentally ill, and seemingly unemployable homeless adult.
The rising tide of children facing homelessness today will become a tsunami tomorrow unless we get to the source of the problem.
The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development’s one-size-fits-all, faulty-evidence-based policy called “Housing First” is at the eye of this hurricane.
Under Housing First, rolled out under the previous administration with the promise to “end homelessness,” aims to provide the homeless with housing for life, without any accountability, incentives, or requirement to change behavior.
Given that the data that shows that 50+ percent of homeless parents are struggling with addiction, and a similar proportion with mental illness, this policy risks exposing their children to additional trauma, and to poor role modeling.
HUD policy discriminates against families by limiting what constitutes a homeless family. Many family–focused non-profits have been forced to close, while others have had to radically change service models to fit HUD’s no-sobriety, no-accountability requirements.
Despite a $1 billion increase in HUD homelessness spending since the 2010-11 school year, homelessness among children is increasing and shows no signs of abating. HUD’s Housing First policy has ignored what is in the best interest of children and isn’t helping adults either, with homelessness at crisis levels.
HUD argues that this crisis is due to a lack of affordable housing and over-regulation, taking the focus off the failures of its decade-long, ‘ending homelessness’ policy.
In his 2020 budget, President Trump focused on reforming ineffective policymaking at federal agencies, proposing to hire evaluation officers to bolster evidence-based policymaking.
President Trump now needs to force HUD to change direction completely and return Housing First to its original purpose as a targeted solution for the severely-addicted and mentally ill homeless.
In addition, he should request that the White House Council of Economic Advisors evaluate HUD’s research claiming that Housing First is evidence-based for all populations, including families, children, and youth.
He should force HUD to adopt the Department of Education’s definition of homelessness, accounting for children staying in motels and sleeping on people’s floors or couches, so that the growing number of homeless women and children are not hidden from public policy or funding.
He should designate the Administration for Children and Families within the Department of Health and Human Services as the agency responsible for homeless families. ACF is much more in tune with the needs of homeless families and children.
And Mr. Trump should create partnerships with churches, the private sector and philanthropy to support the many programs across the country that have demonstrated results in creating self-sufficient individuals and families.
Continuing to support failed homeless policy will guarantee that the homeless crisis metastasizes into a national catastrophe.
Mr. President, please stop the hemorrhaging now.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ABOUT THE AUTHORS:
Lance Izumi is senior director of the Center for Education at the Pacific Research Institute.
Michele Steeb is the former CEO of Saint John’s Program for Real Change, a Sacramento, California-based residential program that supports women and children struggling with homelessness, mental illness and addiction to become self-sustaining. Due to their sobriety accountability and work requirements, Saint John’s has lost millions of dollars in public funding. The Program has successfully served over 30,000 women and children since its inception in 1985.
The President of the United States can NOT be personally responsible for assuring that 330 million people have roofs over their heads.
Bums, winos, and drug addicts are a local problem.
Not Federal.
Uh, free tiny houses?
I see homelessness as a state or city issue.
RE: Bums, winos, and drug addicts are a local problem.
Then what does HUD exist for?
RE: I see homelessness as a state or city issue.
Then what does HUD exist for?
HUD should not exist.
Quit letting them sleep & defecate on the streets. Stop giving them free food & needles.
Make them follow the laws taxpaying citizens follow.
NOT Trump’s problem, and not a Federal issue, nor can the Feds solve it.
the ONLY thing Trump should do is slam these deep-blue, leftist cities for their corrupt management that causes it.
RE: HUD should not exist.
Yes, but unfortunately, it does. Hence, they are required to do something.
Four out of the author’s five “things” are adjustments to HUD policies and procedures. This is the sort of thing the President, as head of the executive branch, should be able to direct his appointees at HUD to accomplish.
(I am not expressing an opinion on whether the author’s ideas are good, just pointing out the type of executive action involved.)
Hud should be abolished. It’s not the FedGov’s swimlane.
The majority are out there because Rats continue to reward bad behavior(and punish good behavior). Won’t be stopping anytime soon.
Maybe the parents should think about getting a job and quit doing drugs and alcohol.
Or am I just being cruel.
Deport them to North Korea.
The root cause of homelessness has to do with city and state governments enacting bone-headed policies like rent control, lengthy and costly building permits, so-called green mandates, strict building codes, and NIMBYism from elitist snobs who don’t want high-rise apartment complexes spoiling their view of the Pacific Ocean. Add to anti-landlord laws and SJWs demanding that housing is a right, and all of this has created an artificial shortage of available housing.
I’m thinking those children should be taken from their lowlife parents.
I think there should be orphanages again.
What about nut houses?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.