Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts Initially Sided With Trump In The Census Citizenship Question — Then Changed His Vote
Hotair ^ | 09/13/2019 | AllahPundit

Posted on 09/13/2019 8:17:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: SeekAndFind

John Roberts, a gift from George W. Bush that, like herpes, just keeps on giving...


41 posted on 09/13/2019 9:02:11 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“FReepers have been saying this since his Obamacare decision but nobody can produce anything.”

Once we’re done with Hillary, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Page, email, Russia, etc., issues, we should sic Sara Carter on this story. See if she can dig up the dirt that was used to blackmail Roberts.


42 posted on 09/13/2019 9:02:52 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Roberts cannot handle pressure and our side will not pressure him. He is taking at least anti seizure medication- Dilantin and may well be taking antipsychotic meds, too, if Dilantin does not alone stop his seizures. Those drugs will destroy his will power and he would be very susceptible to pressure. That is the charitable explanation. Another is blackmail, of course.


43 posted on 09/13/2019 9:04:04 AM PDT by arthurus (m llfbr2 --000o0|x|+in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is Roberts that is “wobbly” and lacking in very many firm principles of his own, AND lacking to stay firm to any principles he does have, other than his “principle” of making the Supreme Court look populist.


44 posted on 09/13/2019 9:04:11 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

funny, how liberal judges, like Ginsberg and the other, NEVER, I mean NEVER take the conservative side.

We need another strong conservative voice, maybe two...

Pack the court with a 7 to 2 conservative majority, and then we can all go to sleep and sleep soundly at night.


45 posted on 09/13/2019 9:05:24 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I missed the last Christmas party at their home, so I’m not sure.


46 posted on 09/13/2019 9:05:43 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

IIRC, Harriet Miers name was withdrawn and GWB submitted Alito, a true conservative.


47 posted on 09/13/2019 9:06:20 AM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The census question threatened to ruin the dems. It has been proven that Obama is not above deceipt, bribery, extra-constitutional means to get his way. He's done it since taking office in Chicago. The Chicago way.

Robert's illegal adoption is probably the hook. Minor law-breaking is one thing for SC nominees (ie. hiring illegal house-keepers), but it's another thing for a sitting Chief Justice. Obama knows it, Roberts knows it.

48 posted on 09/13/2019 9:07:44 AM PDT by chiller (As Davey Crockett once said: Be sure you're right. Then go ahead. I'm goin' ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Simply put, Roberts is willing to disregard the law for the sake of political outcomes that protect his court from too much liberal angst.


49 posted on 09/13/2019 9:09:07 AM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They reminded him that his adopted kids could be taken away from him.

The kids are 18 and 19.

50 posted on 09/13/2019 9:11:34 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

OK, but had she gotten on the Court I could not imagine that she could be doing a worse job than Roberts.


51 posted on 09/13/2019 9:13:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That man has zero integrity. He is owned.


52 posted on 09/13/2019 9:13:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a worthless POS!!!!


53 posted on 09/13/2019 9:15:53 AM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 faced backstabbing Roberts.
Common sense says to ask that question!


54 posted on 09/13/2019 9:19:11 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Those on here that say some one has something on Roberts and that is the reason for some of his decisions, I think, are giving him too much credit. I think he is arrogance at wanting “his court” to be seen as neither conservative or liberal is what drives his decisions, and nothing else. That is very bad when his decisions should be driven by the Constitution. His statement that there are neither Republican nor Democrat judges is a prime example of this point. He either lied when he said it or if he really believes it, he doesn’t belong on the Supreme Court.


55 posted on 09/13/2019 9:20:52 AM PDT by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am always suspicious of anyone whose facial expression never changes at all. There may be examples where he does, I don’t know, but I’ve never seen Judge Roberts show any preponderance of emotion, be it humor and mirth, or anger and frustration. I’m aware that some folks just don’t. Some are skillful at concealing any personal reaction to any outside stimuli.

I.E. Ruth Bader shows the full range from being disgusted to being lighthearted. Judge Roberts does not allow anyone (in the general population) to know what lies within.
Again, this may simply be his version of ‘professional deportment’ and nothing more. He truly IS a VIP.


56 posted on 09/13/2019 9:27:19 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Roberts is compromised and needs to resign or be removed.

Partner, a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court should never ever be a keen observer of public opinion on the Court's rulings??? He definitely needs to resign or be forcibly removed. He is the ultimate "Giant Sixth Grade Brain Chief Justice Roberts of the Supreme Court."

57 posted on 09/13/2019 9:35:49 AM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He gets the call in the the night saying his secret will be revealed if he doesn’t vote the right way


58 posted on 09/13/2019 9:40:06 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

I am 100% convinced he is filthy dirty, and someone has held it over his head for many years.


59 posted on 09/13/2019 9:51:25 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Roberts: deep state has his number. They have the dirt on him or they’ve made it clear what will happen to him and/or his family if he dares follow USConstitution on key votes.

USA will not win if we haven’t representatives and officials willing to risk themselves and family health and well being. Don’t kid yourself, representing USConstitution is dangerous; becoming more dangerous by the day.

This is why the terminology is: wage war; fight. Or perish.


60 posted on 09/13/2019 9:52:50 AM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam; USgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson