Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

“A district court in California should not be given sweeping authority to issue a ruling—let alone on dubious legal reasoning—striking down policy from a duly elected President.”


2 posted on 09/12/2019 10:55:29 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MarvinStinson

“This legislation would restore the appropriate role of district court judges by prohibiting them from issuing nationwide injunctions broader than the parties to the case or the geographic boundaries of the federal district in which the judge presides.”


3 posted on 09/12/2019 10:56:05 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
“A district court in California should not be given sweeping authority to issue a ruling—let alone on dubious legal reasoning—striking down policy from a duly elected President.”

These appointed "legal maniacs" think they are important don't cha know??

28 posted on 09/12/2019 11:37:09 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

This is not needed. What’s needed is for the Supreme Court to end this madness.


33 posted on 09/12/2019 11:47:22 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson