[ObozoMustGo2012]

[“Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution,” ]

Just because they are “long standing principles” doesn’t mean that they are CONSTITUTIONAL!

[SuperLuminal]

"...a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution,..."

A few questions...

1. How "long" is the "longstanding" in this case? Does it extend all the way back to the day the Constitution was approved?
2. Currently, from which foreign country and which migrant invaders are at our borders because of "persecution"? Does being broke or not having two TVs qualify as being "persecuted? (Have you seen crowds of theses invaders wearing nothing but tattered rags and having no shoes? Are the migrants looking like starving remnants of the German concentration camps?) For those who are actually "persecuted", are they mostly drug dealers, murderers, or terrorists persecuted because of their criminal actions?

In fact, for the past decade, the claims/requests for "asylum" have exploded only as a result the large crowd of demoncrat congressmen and activists who have gone to Mexico or the southern border and proposed and encouraged the bogus claim of the need for asylum as a method to cheat their way into the U.S. and onto the demoncrat-voter roles...