[Morgana]

FReepers this is total BS!! Women have reversed the abortion pill and had a baby with great success. It has to be done quickly but it can be done.

These people just want every baby a dead baby.

[Pontiac]

"The provisions of [this law] violate a physician's right not to speak and go far beyond any informed consent laws addressed by the United States Supreme Court, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, or other courts to date."

I wonder if the Informed Consent statement for an abortion states that “the procedure will lead to the death of your child”

[kingu]

I don’t think the court is the source of your bovine droppings; the state legislature and the governor hold that particular field bingo square. The legislation should never have been passed in the first place.

You can’t have it both ways; either the FDA authorizes medications which have gone through trials and shown to be effective for the condition it is prescribed, or everything the FDA does is invalid within the state.

Since in every other manner the state follows the FDA, this off label experiment can’t be mandated as an optional next step. The court was right to quash the mandated speech.

Conversely, the passing and the quashing are undoubtedly going to raise awareness of the experimental treatment to undo chemical abortions. A little silver lining, I suppose, but one which the taxpayers of North Dakota shouldn’t have had to foot the bill for.

[gasport]

So a lawyer is telling physicians how to practice medicine.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I don’t know — when I first heard this, I thought it was the pro-abortionists that pushed this language, because it just makes it easier to TAKE the medication, because yOU THINK you can change your mind — but you aren’t going to change your mind.

Better to tell the woman the truth — that if you take this pill, you are terminating the life of another human being, who is totally dependent on you to protect them.