Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

In this rare case Waters is right. The House can define as impeachable anything they wish.


That depends on whether the Chief Justice, presiding over this farce, rules that some frivolous article of impeachment does not rise to the level of “high crimes and misdemeanor”.


46 posted on 09/09/2019 6:15:11 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Mack the knife

“That depends on whether the Chief Justice, presiding over this farce, rules that some frivolous article of impeachment does not rise to the level of “high crimes and misdemeanor”.

The Chief justice, nor any judicial power, has anything to say on impeachment.

He doesn’t get a vote.

In spite of the silly nonsense some are promulgating on the internet.

It’s a 100% political act between the House and Senate.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors was left deliberately vague, and undefined, for this very reason.

If the House votes to impeach, he’s impeached. Period.


48 posted on 09/09/2019 7:13:54 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson