Shhh, you will anger The Greta,
"We choose truth over facts" ~ the inner voice of liberals
> any possible effect may be so small as to be undetectable within natural variation <
Thanks for posting this, Rocky. All these Global Warming studies are published without any estimate of uncertainty. I’ve been complaining about that for years.
We are now in the midst of perhaps the greatest scientific fraud of all time. And anyone who dares question it is slapped down. It would be funny, except that billions of tax dollars are going to be wasted on this mess.
I’ll believe that this report will have any effect on the masses when the left quit whining about CO2 and the right in government begin citing this evidence to prove man is not causing climate change-
While it’s very cool that he got this published- and kudos to him for doing so- I’m afraid that the ‘New Truth’ as dictated by the left is that man is causing climate change, and the whole world practically now believes the lie
I hope and pray I’m wrong- I pray that the right in government will have enough guts to stand up to the truth, AND to REVERSE all the damaging climate change regulations that have driven prices sky high already!
Frank refers to “climate alarmism” so what do we call those so-called (Bill Nye) or real scientists who practice this view? Let’s call them “Climate Alarmists” whenever they refer to “Climate Change Deniers”.
This article provides a lot of ammunition for those who understand its contents (I understand just a little about modeling and the fact that it is NOT accurate most of the time because of so many weather variables that exist (i.e. how Hurricane Dorian changed course and did not hit Alabama as the original predictions said was a real possibility).
I’ve been through hurricanes all my life and I remember Diana and the other big one of the 1950’s, Camille, Agnes, etc. of the 70’s (and the two typhoons (hurricanes) I was in in S. Vietnam in Nov. 1970 and Taiwan, July 1971), as well.
Whoop-De-Doo, we have weather, sometimes nasty, sometimes very destructive. So what? It has been that way for as far back as the records of mankind exist.
How many Spanish, French, Dutch, English and Chinese fleets have been wiped out by gigantic ocean storms? And what would you call those storms - hurricanes, perhaps.
History is interesting. You’ve just got to read it.
Shhh, you will anger The Greta,
"We choose truth over facts" ~ the inner voice of liberals
who funds research? governments. Follow the agenda or be unemployed. fixed it
There are still some scientists who remain true scientists and who know how much that title is given to so many pseudo scientists today - people who claim to be scientists while ignoring science and ignoring proper scientific methods relative to the claims they make.
Since democrat campaign issues are basically based on lies, how is this LIE going to be removed?
You don't expect Bernie/Booty/CreepyJoe/Kamel/Pocahauntus/Sparticus to just stop because it is proven false, do you?
As a software professional with 30+ years experience, most of it in modeling and simulation, much of it in large scale modeling of complex systems... I’ve said for years what the climate scammers are doing with the climate models is just wrong, a complete travesty to real M&S people.
Nick Stokes has posted an article at Watts Up With That which says in the conclusion that Pat Frank’s analysis of error propagation was flawed.
Roy Spencer also refutes Pat Frank’s conclusion:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/13/a-stove-top-analogy-to-climate-models/