To: Cboldt
In addition, federal prosecutors say Correia demanded his chief of staff give him half of her $78,700 salary in return for appointing her and allowing her to keep her city job. He thought someone was going to sit still for that kind of larceny?
Maybe if it was a ‘No Show’ job and she could keep working he old job.
And that would not surprise me.
10 posted on
09/07/2019 5:43:43 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: Pontiac
She probably ratted him out because he made a move on her. #MeTwo
15 posted on
09/07/2019 5:49:54 AM PDT by
Cboldt
To: Pontiac
Maybe if it was a ‘No Show’ job and she could keep working he old job. That's what the article appears to be saying. "for appointing her and allowing her to keep her city job" implies that she was collecting the "chief of staff" salary AND was still collecting a salary for some other city job.
20 posted on
09/07/2019 6:13:31 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson