Posted on 08/22/2019 4:22:34 PM PDT by zaxtres
“Can you post a link to the CT article?”
I suggested a bodyguard and not eating out to him and he replied that there was no question.
Was there a link?
I was wondering what to make of all this before I read your post... lmao.
This is weird. He seems to know things. He is very wealthy. He knows lots of people. He has degrees from Cambridge and Stanford. But the government scares him. So lets see if this is covered up. Or he is crazy. Or Barr now has the missing link. It sounds like the CIA just likes to have blackmail material on anyone who could be President. And they did not really care who. They just wanted dirt on anyone who might be a President, so they can get the favours they need.
He says he meant 6000 miles, not 600.
Now which method?
1. “Suicide” -assisted of course
2. Car “accident”
3. Plane/ helicopter “accident”
4. Robbery gone bad aka Seth Rich method
5. Heart attack /natural cause -died in sleep -smothered by pillow ect.
6. Mass shooting - Starbucks murders
7. Various past other methods or something new?
>> What’s the over/under on his death in the next week?
Certavi et vici
See link at post 35
He is already in South America and well protected. I think he will make it. I hope so anyway.
Sara Carters lawyer wrote this up a few weeks ago and sent it to Barr and the FBI. So, I think that they think its real enough. I wonder if Maria ever saw Seth Rich. Or if she met anyone else. Or maybe she was working for our side. And she is in jail now just to look the part.
Also, notice how the Council of Foreign Relations is in everything bad. They are a group of elites who think they are all knowing. I bet half of them knew Epstein.
Hillary a victim? I'm not buying it.
“This is a deep state move to make Hillary the victim and not Trump.”
That’s certainly part of what he is doing.
Hillary’s campaign paid for the Steele Dossier and yet here we have Byrne claiming that Strzok and McCabe were plotting to spy on Hillary and were sloppy enough to be discussing it in front of him.
If two professionals like Strzok and McCabe were going to use Byrne as a stooge the last thing they would do is openly discuss illegal spying in front of him.
And he never gets around to describing why they would be using a corporate CEO or what they wanted him to do. The whole story makes no sense. The outside people actively implementing Spygate were Stefan Halper and Joseph Misfud, a couple of professional spooks. Byrne is either delusional or he’s actively trying to muddy the waters by turning Hillary into a victim.
You talked to him? Messaged?
So he’s not concerned or has already taken precautions?
This is one wild story, for sure.
“He is rambling, and as Whittaker points out just after, Byrne’s remarks are light on specifics.”
‘Light’ gives Byrne too much credit. There’s no meat at all in his story. It dissipates like mist when you try looking for any facts in it.
“This guy was involved in the Russia thing how?”
You’re not supposed to notice that that was entirely missing in his tale. It was all suggestion and posturing with a few names thrown in to get us interested.
On twitter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.