Doing their job by lying about what the law is, has long ago ceased to be an acceptable reason to toss them out.
This does not mean we should simply blindly accept what they say. When they are wrong, we should denounce and ridicule their rulings, and point out what is the correct interpretation of the law.
Thats why 2 out of 3 appellate court judges can overturn a ruling that is wrong on the law or 5 out of 9 judges if an appeal gets to the Supreme Court.
But there never has been a time and there wont ever be a time when the approach to constitutional interpretation is controlled by only one judicial ideology on all court decisions.
We just have to deal with the fact that Bill Clinton appointed 378 Article III federal judges and Barack Obama appointed another 329 federal judges. Those justices and judges usually will reflect the philosophy of the president who appointed them.