I’d like to see them define what consummation of marriage means now that they’ve totally fubar’d the definition of marriage.
Yes. Once SCOTUS used equal protection (incorrectly) as a basis for allowing same-sex marriage, this opens the door to a commercial enterprise in large-number-parties marriage. For a fee, you and thousands of others can marry me and thus obtain the privilidges I have with medical insurance companies, health insurance companies, and so on.
The catch to this plan is the necessity and form of consumation of marriage.
In all seriousness, I'd marry each of my children if this would serve some business or economic benefit for my children, such as remaining on my health insurance plan. (And my wife would go for it.) The courts and your local court house COULD NOT reject it, based on SCOTUS' (incorrect) use of equal protection.