Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

Did you read the rest of the article?

“Carpenter’s firearms had to remain in police custody until the plaintiff can say, in court, that he’s not the man that she filed a complaint against. He’d then have to petition the court to get his firearms back...and he would have to bear the cost. Carpenter will get his day in court later this month. ...”


8 posted on 08/20/2019 7:15:46 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mikelets456
“Carpenter’s firearms had to remain in police custody until the plaintiff can say, in court, that he’s not the man that she filed a complaint against.

And if she declines to show up, or cannot be found?

22 posted on 08/20/2019 8:04:11 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

I think this type of temporary injunction was around before the newer Red Flag Law, but it’s very similar. They’ve been around a long time so I don’t think they’ll be found unconstitutional. The best action would be to get them repealed in the legislature.

Whining about temporary injunctions being unconstitutional isn’t going to work.

We’ll need statistics to show that Red Flag laws don’t help.


36 posted on 08/20/2019 10:00:15 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson