Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the Elites Think Americans 'Need' Has Nothing to Do with Individual Rights
American Thinker.com ^ | August 20, 2019 | William Sullivan

Posted on 08/20/2019 5:57:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Kaslin

To the best of my recollection, the first ten amendments to the Constitution aren’t listed as the Bill of Needs. Rosa Parks didn’t NEED to sit at the front of the bus. Which RIGHT will the Left decide we don’t NEED any more after disposing of the RKBA? After that one is gone, so are all of the rest. Note my tag line.


21 posted on 08/20/2019 7:27:33 AM PDT by Pecos (My rights as an individual are not subject to a public vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp

I don’t need the NYT or NPR, so let’s ban them!


22 posted on 08/20/2019 8:25:29 AM PDT by allwrong57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s because the left are “collectivist” in their thinking. They start with the question, “what is in the best interests of the COLLECTIVE?”. From there, they decide, for everyone, that guns aren’t in the best interests of the collective because they believe, simply, that if you get rid of guns you get rid of gun crime.

This is monumentally stupid on multiple levels. First, and this is what makes the USA unique, we believe the best interests of the collective are INDIVIDUAL rights, that the rights of the individual trump the collective. This is what European’s, along with our Canadian friends, don’t understand. Second, criminals will be the only people with guns. Third, it’s a right to protect from a tyrannical government. Fourth, we can also organize militia - this is hugely understated. No other western nation comes close to contemplating an armed populace and allowing them to organize as an armed militia.

In the UK, the concept of individual rights has been completely eroded. You can now commit the crime of ‘offending somebody’. Of course the offended are Muslim’s that demonstrate they’ll become violent. Instead if arresting those that will be violent due to being offended it’s far easier to arrest the person speaking offensive remarks. This means speaking truth is now illegal, supported by the social media platforms.

The world is starting to notice what makes the USA special, be it the UK or Hong Kong. It’s the same reason why the left here have become so rabid, they’re losing and they know it. Their only recourse is to drown out all voices other than their own in an attempt to brainwash everyone. The problem is, for the most part, everyone already sees their game - they’ve already lost but don’t know it.


23 posted on 08/20/2019 8:28:05 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There are some who argue, for example, that the Second Amendment was never meant to guarantee any individual right, as CNN’s Chris Cuomo...

Fredo's a fool who lives in a safe (gated) home with massive security. HE doesn't need to protect himself - he pays others to protect him...

I'm willing to talk to these phony elites when THEY agree to outlaw all bodyguards and PAID security.

24 posted on 08/20/2019 9:01:33 AM PDT by GOPJ (Epstein - Child-Rape Pimp for White Liberal Elites... FOB - Friend of Bill...Invisible to the NYT's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The elites have nose rings and the media pulls them to where ever the want them.


25 posted on 08/20/2019 9:59:15 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beef

“What this country “need” is a good five cent cigar.” Vice President Thomas R. Marshall of President Woodrow Wilson administration.


26 posted on 08/20/2019 11:12:15 AM PDT by cargocruiser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

what gun control advocates think Americans “need.”


As a free American citizen, I think I’m entitled to determine what I ‘need’.


27 posted on 08/20/2019 5:10:12 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“Why does anyone need a [insert any arbitrarily chosen gun, or gun accessory, of some specific caliber, muzzle velocity, rate of fire,

My answer is always so that I can shoot the SOB who wants to take it away from me.

28 posted on 08/20/2019 5:40:42 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Human beings don't behave rationally. We rationalize our behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cargocruiser

And a good twenty dollar piece of tail


29 posted on 08/20/2019 7:49:06 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson